| Hotel is old but in place and still good |
Guest Rating: 6.7 |
lam V.
|
Vietnam
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 31 May 2009 |
| Value for Money: |
|
8/10 |
| Location: |
|
6/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
8/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
6/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
The staff friendly and a dedicated, near the food. reasonable price for tourists common internet fee quite expensive (15pt / $ 1) Hotel is old but in place and still good, the staff friendly and a dedicated, internet fee quite expensive (15pt / $ 1) near the food. reasonable price for tourists common
|
| Fragrance Sapphire Hotel |
Guest Rating: 7.3 |
somchart N.
|
Thailand
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 25 May 2009 |
| Value for Money: |
|
10/10 |
| Location: |
|
8/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
8/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
8/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
4/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
Small room,no facilities,hard beds Fragrance Sapphire Hotel is one of the good hotel from Fragrance choices, in terms of Price.
The location is in beginning side of Gaylang Road.
Hotel's quite clean,but room size is so small and hard bed. There is no facilities in the room.
If you find 2star+ hotel with cleanliness , you can choose this hotel.
For transportation, quite far from MRT ,by walk approximately 15-20mins to Kallang MRT. The taxi service is available,to Orchard Road about SGD12-15,For your information, the night time round 10-11pm.is the most difficult time to find taxi in Gaylang Road.
|
| Fragrance Sapphire |
Guest Rating: 4.7 |
yao N.
|
China
Couple
Date of Stay: 05 Oct 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
6/10 |
| Location: |
|
2/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
4/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
4/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
Hygiene not so good. Located in the red-light district. Whenever I ride a cab to the hotel, drivers keep saying bad things about the district and seemed to judge those who stay at hotels in the district. Food in that district is famous though. staffs are friendly.
Restaurant Tip : Good food in the district.
|
| Good for nothing |
Guest Rating: 2 |
vikas A.
|
India
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 24 Jun 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
2/10 |
| Location: |
|
2/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
2/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
2/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
2/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
2/10 |
|
I will advise you never stay in this hotel.
|
| If you need a budget accommodation |
Guest Rating: 5.3 |
kyoko S.
|
Japan
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 20 Jun 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
4/10 |
| Location: |
|
4/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
6/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
4/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
8/10 |
|
I think it is a bit expensive for what it should be. It is far from the centre of the city, and I think there are same valued hotels in the centre of the city.
|
| Living in a bow |
Guest Rating: 4.7 |
inge L.
|
Norway
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 11 Apr 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
6/10 |
| Location: |
|
8/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
4/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
2/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
2/10 |
|
Extremely small room, hardly place to open a suitcase. No separate shower cabinet. It is probably around the same standard as most maids' room in Singapore..
|