arrow-up-icon Earn points on your existing loyalty program!
Back to hotel info

Good 6.9
Based on 401 reviews

Recent customer comments

Filter by traveler type
Good



based on 401 reviews
  • Hotel Condition/Cleanliness 7.0
  • Facilities 5.8
  • Location 6.9
  • Room Comfort/Standard 7.1
  • Staff Performance 7.0
  • Value for Money 6.8
  • Food/Dining 6.6

8 Jiraroj T.
Thailand
March 27, 2015
Great location
Great location, clean, nice city view
Close to a shopping mall, nice city view and have a secure car park

6.7 Supaporn J.
Thailand
March 03, 2015
Good location
Good room size and nice view over the city. Resonable price.

8 Siriporn S.
Thailand
February 02, 2015
Good Room
Clean , Convenient

5.3 Dixon L.
Malaysia
December 27, 2014
Not for the single traveller
It's always busy with tour buses. Room was dark and dusty. They gave me two key latched to a 1kg steel hotel room Key chain. Lights are not automatically on with the master switch except for the entrance and toilet. They don't provide iron and ironing board in the room and laundry dept only opens at 9:30am, according to housekeeping's broken English or my broken Thai.

8 U M.
Myanmar
December 07, 2014
Enjoy and telex to stay and quite place
Well value of money, well trained staff and clean room with all classic hotal
Thanks thanks thanks and appreciate

3.7 Petcharat T.
Thailand
December 03, 2014
..
Nothing
..

6 Ploynapass B.
Thailand
November 28, 2014
convenience hotel
good room
good room.....

6 Jerry C.
Singapore
November 21, 2014
Lousy breakfast, no WIFI !
Big room
Normal, don't expect much. No Wifi , no free internet. Got to pay for it and it's unreliable . Paid for 2 days of internet but got expired after day 1.

6 Panuch W.
Thailand
November 14, 2014
old hotel, good location
good staff but room quite small and old

5.7 Peter M.
Australia
November 10, 2014
Basic room
Food, staff, parking
The only complaint I have is that the room didn't have any soap or shower gel and smoke from other peoples rooms invaded our room. I asked for non-smoking which seemed to be ignored.