| Hotel in a quiet place |
Guest Rating: 9 |
sophy S.
|
Cambodia
Family with older children
Date of Stay: 01 Nov 2009 |
| Value for Money: |
|
8/10 |
| Location: |
|
8/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
10/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
10/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
10/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
8/10 |
|
The hotel is under the renovation so it is difficult to rate it now.
The hotel is under the renovation.
Hotel is located in a quiet and peaceful place. Staff are nice and friendly. Food is fine.
|
| old hotel |
Guest Rating: 5 |
sunee C.
|
Thailand
Couple
Date of Stay: 11 Jun 2009 |
| Value for Money: |
|
4/10 |
| Location: |
|
4/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
4/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
6/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
no good service,long far from center,difficult to fide food,old hotel
old hotel.long far from center
Nightlife Tip : kawsan road
|
| Far from Khaosan! |
Guest Rating: 5.7 |
kiyun Y.
|
South Korea
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 25 Dec 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
6/10 |
| Location: |
|
10/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
4/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
2/10 |
|
quite a walk to Khaosan Road.
It takes a while to walk to Khaosan Road,
but very delicious food^^
|
| A RESTFUL AND AFFORDABLEPLACE FOR A SHORT STAY |
Guest Rating: 7 |
ngo V.
|
Australia
Couple
Date of Stay: 20 Aug 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
8/10 |
| Location: |
|
8/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
8/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
Staff are reasonably helpful; breakfast is reasonably good; linen andtowels are very good and clean; cleaning services are accptable.
there are mosquitos around because of the many small plants and fish ponds; really you cannot have the cake and eat it as well. Room fixtures could be better or upgraded.
I stayed on and off at Trang Hotel before, and that was the main reason for the upgraded room (to Junior Suite) allocated to me. Thank you Khun Nooch, Assistant Manager. The management has done a reasonably good job to improve the hotel and its facilities. The good-quality linen, towels and the firm mattresses are really good, espcially for cleaning and sleeping. However, the central air-con system is too cold at night, and the control panelis not effective in the suite during my stay. All in all, reasonably good value for money, and for commute to nearby places of attractions.
|
| NOT SO GOOD TRANG |
Guest Rating: 2.7 |
sharon G.
|
New Zealand
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 06 Jun 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
2/10 |
| Location: |
|
2/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
4/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
2/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
2/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
4/10 |
|
NOTHING ABOUT THIS HOTEL RATE MUCH OF A MENTION
TOURIST BEWARE YOU WILL NEED TO HAVE YOUR WITS ABOUT YOU TO STAY HERE. UPON ARRIVAL I WAS GIVEN A FOURTH RATE ROOM THE WINDOWS WERE HELD TOGETHER WITH SILVER TAPE THE BATH WAS RUSTY NOT VERY IMPRESSED AS I HAD JUST ARRIVED FROM A LONG FLIGHT
THIS HOTEL JUST IS NOT FOR THE SOLO TRAVELLER THE VALUE FOR MONEY WAS NOT THERE I WAS MOST DISAPPOINTED IN MY FIRST ROOM HOWEVER UPON APPROACHING RECEPTION I WAS OFFERED A ROOM IN THE MAIN BUILDING THIS WAS BETTER I PAID FOR A SUPERIOR ROOM NOT SURE WHAT THIS MEANS AT THIS PARTICULAR HOTEL. UNFORTUNATELY DINNING WAS AT THE HOTEL AS NOTHING WAS CLOSE BY THIS HOTEL SEEMS TO BE HIDDEN AWAY DOWN A BACK LANE IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR ACTION ONE WOULD NEED TO GET TAXIS ALL THE TIME THEREFORE THIS IS NOT IN A VERY GOOD LOCATION I WILL NEVER STAY HERE AGAIN . I AM SURE THERE ARE MUCH NICER HOTELS FOR THE SAME PRICE IN BANGKOK OVERALL VERY DISAPPOINTED IN THE HOTEL
Hotel Feature Tip : UNFORTUNATELY THERE WAS NO OTHER SELECTION FOR ME I WOULD NOT LIKE A REPEAT PERFORMANCE AT THE HOTEL
|
| Not worth the money |
Guest Rating: 3.3 |
joakim L.
|
Sweden
Couple
Date of Stay: 23 Jan 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
2/10 |
| Location: |
|
4/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
2/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
2/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
4/10 |
|
When you take a shower you wet the whole bathroom. If you want electricity you have to crawl on the floor and remove the TV contact. We will definitely not stay here any longer. Take a walk to Khao San area instead, we did after one night.
|
| Trang Hotel |
Guest Rating: 5.3 |
norikazu S.
|
Vietnam
Family with young children
Date of Stay: 01 Jan 2008 |
| Value for Money: |
|
8/10 |
| Location: |
|
2/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
4/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
4/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
8/10 |
|
It's so far from tourist attraction and the central place of Bangkok.
|
| Trang Hotel |
Guest Rating: 6.3 |
suzuki T.
|
Japan
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 31 Dec 2007 |
| Value for Money: |
|
6/10 |
| Location: |
|
6/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
8/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
6/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
The swimming pool was very big and the staff were very kind.
|
| Very good value for money! |
Guest Rating: 9 |
alvin Y.
|
Singapore
Couple
Date of Stay: 28 Dec 2007 |
| Value for Money: |
|
10/10 |
| Location: |
|
10/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
10/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
8/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
8/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
8/10 |
|
It's a bit far from the places of interest, but you can give the travel desk a chance. They were quite friendly and helpful even though I didn't take up any tours or get a cab from them. (I've been to Bangkok enough times to go around my own.)
|
| Basic but very acceptable |
Guest Rating: 6 |
thomas T.
|
Australia
Couple
Date of Stay: 02 Dec 2007 |
| Value for Money: |
|
6/10 |
| Location: |
|
6/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
6/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
We found the hotel very acceptable, and the pool would be a big drawcard in hot weather.
Restaurant Tip : The Thai restaurant across the road and near the lights (at the intersection away from the river) has very nice seafood and genuine Thai food at very reasonable prices (and an English menu).
|
| Quick stay at the Trang |
Guest Rating: 7.7 |
nitin B.
|
India
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 13 Aug 2007 |
| Value for Money: |
|
10/10 |
| Location: |
|
6/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
8/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
8/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
8/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
Trang is a great value for money, is located in a pretty decent area, and is quiet. Would definitely stay here again.
|
| mosquitos! |
Guest Rating: 5.3 |
junko Y.
|
Japan
Couple
Date of Stay: 12 Aug 2007 |
| Value for Money: |
|
6/10 |
| Location: |
|
4/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
4/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
Cleanliness and there were so many mosquitoes.
Cheap price hotel. If you plan to use taxi mainly and not walk, location is O.K. But you should take mosquito buster because their pool produce many mosquitoes.
|
| Not a great deal |
Guest Rating: 5 |
marvin D.
|
Canada
Couple
Date of Stay: 15 Jul 2006 |
| Value for Money: |
|
4/10 |
| Location: |
|
6/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
4/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
4/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
Find a better place, even if it costs a few extra bucks.
|
This review was originally written in German and translated by To view the original text
click here
| Washout due to construction works |
Guest Rating: 4.7 |
daniel B.
|
Germany
Solo Traveler
Date of Stay: 22 Mar 2009 |
| Value for Money: |
|
2/10 |
| Location: |
|
6/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
6/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
4/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
4/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
The location is convenient, because it close to the river and Kaosan is not directly in the crowd to be.
I know the Tranghotel from a previous stay in 2007 and wanted it in use again this year - a complete washout. Everything the hotel makes the beautiful courtyard, the Poo, the newer wing, is completely blocked due to construction works. The usable part is old and has come down so completely overpriced. There is no possibility to sit outside, except right next to the noisy street. From a residence, I can therefore only currently strongly advise against!
Sightseeing/Attractions Tip : The walk to Kaosan lead by a very beautiful temple complex with small channels - a city.
|
This review was originally written in German and translated by To view the original text
click here
| Again and again, good for a short stay |
Guest Rating: 6 |
werner H.
|
Switzerland
Couple
Date of Stay: 06 Feb 2009 |
| Value for Money: |
|
6/10 |
| Location: |
|
6/10 |
| Staff Performance: |
|
8/10 |
|
| Hotel Condition/Cleanliness: |
|
4/10 |
| Room Comfort/Standard: |
|
6/10 |
| Food/Dining: |
|
6/10 |
|
Central, Cheap, Simple, Beautiful Garden, Breakfast Buffet
Furniture very old and worn, carpets in the entire hotel smelled pretty strict, z.Teil old air conditioners with 3 stages
The hotel offers hotel adjoining tract in a pool in which I never saw someone swim. Otherwise OK for 1-2 nights is also the shopping center of Bangkok can take a taxi (about 60-70 THB) depending on the traffic in 10-15 min. reached werden.Über Agoda we have for this hotel found the cheapest price!
Sightseeing/Attractions Tip : If you like shopping, then you must visit the MBK Center! As one can at least 1 day during Rumstöbern linger ... Have fun!
|